
doi: 10.1002/nur.10015
pmid: 11807922
AbstractMissing data occur frequently in survey and longitudinal research. Incomplete data are problematic, particularly in the presence of substantial absent information or systematic nonresponse patterns. Listwise deletion and mean imputation are the most common techniques to reconcile missing data. However, more recent techniques may improve parameter estimates, standard errors, and test statistics. The purpose of this article is to review the problems associated with missing data, options for handling missing data, and recent multiple imputation methods. It informs researchers' decisions about whether to delete or impute missing responses and the method best suited to doing so. An empirical investigation of AIDS care data outcomes illustrates the process of multiple imputation. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Res Nurs Health 25:76–84, 2002.
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Data Collection, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Reproducibility of Results, Workload, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing Research, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Bias, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Least-Squares Analysis, Software
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Data Collection, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Reproducibility of Results, Workload, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing Research, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome, Bias, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Least-Squares Analysis, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 164 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
