
doi: 10.1002/num.20263
handle: 11311/513605
AbstractToday's computers allow us to simulate large, complex physical problems. Many times the mathematical models describing such problems are based on a relatively small amount of available information such as experimental measurements. The question arises whether the computed data could be used as the basis for decision in critical engineering, economic, and medicine applications. The representative list of engineering accidents occurred in the past years and their reasons illustrate the question. The paper describes a general framework for verification and validation (V&V) which deals with this question. The framework is then applied to an illustrative engineering problem, in which the basis for decision is a specific quantity of interest, namely the probability that the quantity does not exceed a given value. The V&V framework is applied and explained in detail. The result of the analysis is the computation of the failure probability as well as a quantification of the confidence in the computation, depending on the amount of available experimental data. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 23: 753–784, 2007
model validation, numerical examples, uncertainty quantification, Computational problems in statistics, failure probability, Bayesian update, experimental data, Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures, Algorithms with automatic result verification, confidence, verification
model validation, numerical examples, uncertainty quantification, Computational problems in statistics, failure probability, Bayesian update, experimental data, Empirical decision procedures; empirical Bayes procedures, Algorithms with automatic result verification, confidence, verification
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
