
doi: 10.1002/num.10058
AbstractIn this article we analyze the effect of mass‐lumping in the linear triangular finite element approximation of second‐order elliptic eigenvalue problems. We prove that the eigenvalue obtained by using mass‐lumping is always below the one obtained with exact integration. For singular eigenfunctions, as those arising in non convex polygons, we prove that the eigenvalue obtained with mass‐lumping is above the exact eigenvalue when the mesh size is small enough. So, we conclude that the use of mass‐lumping is convenient in the singular case. When the eigenfunction is smooth several numerical experiments suggest that the eigenvalue computed with mass‐lumping is below the exact one if the mesh is not too coarse. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 19: 653–664, 2003
Numerical methods for eigenvalue problems for boundary value problems involving PDEs, numerical examples, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite elements, Estimates of eigenvalues in context of PDEs, singular eigenfunctions, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, elliptic eigenvalue problems, mass-lumping
Numerical methods for eigenvalue problems for boundary value problems involving PDEs, numerical examples, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite elements, Estimates of eigenvalues in context of PDEs, singular eigenfunctions, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, elliptic eigenvalue problems, mass-lumping
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
