
doi: 10.1002/num.10025
handle: 2027.42/34949
AbstractWe report here on our numerical study of the two‐dimensional Riemann problem for the compressible Euler equations. Compared with the relatively simple 1‐D configurations, the 2‐D case consists of a plethora of geometric wave patterns that pose a computational challenge for high‐resolution methods. The main feature in the present computations of these 2‐D waves is the use of the Riemann‐solvers‐free central schemes presented by Kurganov et al. This family of central schemes avoids the intricate and time‐consuming computation of the eigensystem of the problem and hence offers a considerably simpler alternative to upwind methods. The numerical results illustrate that despite their simplicity, the central schemes are able to recover with comparable high resolution, the various features observed in the earlier, more expensive computations. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 18: 584–608, 2002
semi-discrete central schemes, Mathematics and Statistics, nonoscillatory piecewise polynomial reconstructions, multidimensional conservation laws, Science, Gas dynamics (general theory), Euler equations, Mathematics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
semi-discrete central schemes, Mathematics and Statistics, nonoscillatory piecewise polynomial reconstructions, multidimensional conservation laws, Science, Gas dynamics (general theory), Euler equations, Mathematics, Finite difference methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 307 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
