
arXiv: 2009.08008
AbstractThe peridynamic theory brings advantages in dealing with discontinuities, dynamic loading, and nonlocality. The integro‐differential formulation of peridynamics poses challenges to numerical solutions of complicated and practical problems. Some important issues attract much attention, such as the computation of infinite domains, the treatment of softening of boundaries due to an incomplete horizon, and time accumulation error in dynamic processes. In this work, we develop the boundary element method of peridynamics (PD‐BEM). The numerical examples demonstrate that the PD‐BEM exhibits several features. First, for nondestructive cases, the PD‐BEM can be one to two orders of magnitude faster than the meshless particle method of peridynamics (PD‐MPM) that directly discretizes the computational domains; second, it eliminates the time accumulation error, and thus conserves the total energy much better than the PD‐MPM; third, it does not exhibit spurious boundary softening phenomena. For destructive cases where new boundaries emerge during the loading process, we propose a coupling scheme where the PD‐MPM is applied to the cracked region and the PD‐BEM is applied to the uncracked region such that the time of computation can be significantly reduced.
reciprocal theorem, linear elasticity, Boundary element methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), coupling method, boundary element method, Peridynamics, Green function, FOS: Mathematics, peridynamic theory, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Boundary element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
reciprocal theorem, linear elasticity, Boundary element methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), coupling method, boundary element method, Peridynamics, Green function, FOS: Mathematics, peridynamic theory, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Boundary element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
