
doi: 10.1002/nme.5745
SummaryIn this paper, by combining the dimension splitting method and the improved complex variable element‐free Galerkin method, the dimension splitting and improved complex variable element‐free Galerkin (DS‐ICVEFG) method is presented for 3‐dimensional (3D) transient heat conduction problems. Using the dimension splitting method, a 3D transient heat conduction problem is translated into a series of 2‐dimensional ones, which can be solved with the improved complex variable element‐free Galerkin (ICVEFG) method. In the ICVEFG method for each 2‐dimensional problem, the improved complex variable moving least‐square approximation is used to obtain the shape functions, and the penalty method is used to apply the essential boundary conditions. Finite difference method is used in the 1‐dimensional direction, and the Galerkin weak form of 3D transient heat conduction problem is used to obtain the final discretized equations. Then, the DS‐ICVEFG method for 3D transient heat conduction problems is presented. Four numerical examples are given to show that the new method has higher computational precision and efficiency.
dimension splitting and improved complex variable element-free Galerkin method, dimension splitting method, improved complex variable element-free Galerkin method, Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in thermodynamics and heat transfer, improved complex variable moving least-square approximation, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite difference method
dimension splitting and improved complex variable element-free Galerkin method, dimension splitting method, improved complex variable element-free Galerkin method, Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in thermodynamics and heat transfer, improved complex variable moving least-square approximation, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, finite difference method
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
