
doi: 10.1002/nme.2604
AbstractA methodology is presented for generating enrichment functions in generalized finite element methods (GFEM) using experimental and/or simulated data. The approach is based on the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) technique, which is used to generate low‐order representations of data that contain general information about the solution of partial differential equations. One of the main challenges in such enriched finite element methods is knowing how to choose, a priori, enrichment functions that capture the nature of the solution of the governing equations. POD produces low‐order subspaces, that are optimal in some norm, for approximating a given data set. For most problems, since the solution error in Galerkin methods is bounded by the error in the best approximation, it is expected that the optimal approximation properties of POD can be exploited to construct efficient enrichment functions. We demonstrate the potential of this approach through three numerical examples. Best‐approximation studies are conducted that reveal the advantages of using POD modes as enrichment functions in GFEM over a conventional POD basis. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
enrichment, enriched finite elements, generalized finite element method, Hydro- and aero-acoustics, POD, partition of unity, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
enrichment, enriched finite elements, generalized finite element method, Hydro- and aero-acoustics, POD, partition of unity, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
