
doi: 10.1002/nme.2550
AbstractUncertainty quantification is playing an increasingly important role in assessing the performance, safety, and reliability of complex physical systems in the absence of adequate amount of experimental data. Simulation of a complex system involves multiple levels of modeling, such as material (lowest level) to component to subsystem to system (highest level). This paper presents a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach to quantify both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties in hierarchical model development. A generalized structural equation modeling with latent variables is presented to model three sets of relationships in hierarchical model development, namely, model predictions vs experimental observations at each individual level, model predictions at lower vs higher levels, and experimental data at lower vs higher levels. The three sets of relationships are represented by a hierarchical Bayes network, and the influencing factors between them are estimated by a Bayesian regression approach. Both measurement and prediction errors at various levels are quantified through the Bayesian method. The variability of input variables in the computational model is updated and quantified using various levels of measurement data via Bayesian inference and the structural equation modeling parameters. The proposed methodology is illustrated with a transient heat conduction example problem. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Other numerical methods (thermodynamics), Bayes network, uncertainty quantification, Heat and mass transfer, heat flow, Bayesian updating, latent variable, structural equation modeling
Other numerical methods (thermodynamics), Bayes network, uncertainty quantification, Heat and mass transfer, heat flow, Bayesian updating, latent variable, structural equation modeling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
