
doi: 10.1002/nla.2456
AbstractThis study compares various multigrid strategies for the fast solution of elliptic equations discretized by the hybrid high‐order method. Combinations of ‐, ‐, and ‐coarsening strategies are considered, combined with diverse intergrid transfer operators. Comparisons are made experimentally on 2D and 3D test cases, with structured and unstructured meshes, and with nested and non‐nested hierarchies. Advantages and drawbacks of each strategy are discussed for each case to establish simplified guidelines for the optimization of the time to solution.
Multigrid methods; domain decomposition for boundary value problems involving PDEs, coarsening strategy, elliptic partial differential equation, Numerical solution of discretized equations for boundary value problems involving PDEs, hybrid high-order, multigrid
Multigrid methods; domain decomposition for boundary value problems involving PDEs, coarsening strategy, elliptic partial differential equation, Numerical solution of discretized equations for boundary value problems involving PDEs, hybrid high-order, multigrid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
