
doi: 10.1002/net.21497
AbstractTraffic in communication networks fluctuates heavily over time. Thus, to avoid capacity bottlenecks, operators highly overestimate the traffic volume during network planning. In this article we consider telecommunication network design under traffic uncertainty, adapting the robust optimization approach of Bertsimas and Sim [Oper Res 52 (2004), 35–53]. We present two different mathematical formulations for this problem, provide valid inequalities, study the computational implications, and evaluate the realized robustness. To enhance the performance of the mixed‐integer programming solver, we derive robust cutset inequalities generalizing their deterministic counterparts. Instead of a single cutset inequality for every network cut, we derive multiple valid inequalities by exploiting the extra variables available in the robust formulations. We show that these inequalities define facets under certain conditions and that they completely describe a projection of the robust cutset polyhedron if the cutset consists of a single edge. For realistic networks and live traffic measurements, we compare the formulations and report on the speed‐up achieved by the valid inequalities. We study the “price of robustness” and evaluate the approach by analyzing the real network load. The results show that the robust optimization approach has the potential to support network planners better than present methods. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, 2013
Network design and communication in computer systems, Communication networks in operations research, Sensitivity, stability, parametric optimization, network design, robust optimization, Programming involving graphs or networks, polyhedral combinatorics
Network design and communication in computer systems, Communication networks in operations research, Sensitivity, stability, parametric optimization, network design, robust optimization, Programming involving graphs or networks, polyhedral combinatorics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
