
doi: 10.1002/net.20095
handle: 11568/106035
AbstractMobile agents operating in networked environments face threats from other agents as well as from the hosts (i.e., network sites) they visit. A black hole is a harmful host that destroys incoming agents without leaving any trace. To determine the location of such a harmful host is a dangerous but crucial task, called black hole search. The most important parameter for a solution strategy is the number of agents it requires (the size); the other parameter of interest is the total number of moves performed by the agents (the cost). It is known that at least two agents are needed; furthermore, with full topological knowledge, Ω(n log n) moves are required in arbitrary networks. The natural question is whether, in specific networks, it is possible to obtain (topology‐dependent but) more cost efficient solutions. It is known that this is not the case for rings. In this article, we show that this negative result does not generalizes. In fact, we present a general strategy that allows two agents to locate the black hole with O(n) moves in common interconnection networks: hypercubes, cube‐connected cycles, star graphs, wrapped butterflies, chordal rings, as well as in multidimensional meshes and tori of restricted diameter. These results hold even if the networks are anonymous. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 47(2), 61–71 2006
Network design and communication in computer systems, anonymous networks, biconnected graphs, malicious host, distributed search, traversal pair, Network protocols, distributed mobile computing, mobile agents, interconnection networks
Network design and communication in computer systems, anonymous networks, biconnected graphs, malicious host, distributed search, traversal pair, Network protocols, distributed mobile computing, mobile agents, interconnection networks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
