
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28957
pmid: 34350634
PurposeThe presence of dipole‐inconsistent data due to substantial noise or artifacts causes streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) reconstructions. Often used Bayesian approaches rely on regularizers, which in turn yield reduced sharpness. To overcome this problem, we present a novel L1‐norm data fidelity approach that is robust with respect to outliers, and therefore prevents streaking artifacts.MethodsQSM functionals are solved with linear and nonlinear L1‐norm data fidelity terms using functional augmentation, and are compared with equivalent L2‐norm methods. Algorithms were tested on synthetic data, with phase inconsistencies added to mimic lesions, QSM Challenge 2.0 data, and in vivo brain images with hemorrhages.ResultsThe nonlinear L1‐norm‐based approach achieved the best overall error metric scores and better streaking artifact suppression. Notably, L1‐norm methods could reconstruct QSM images without using a brain mask, with similar regularization weights for different data fidelity weighting or masking setups.ConclusionThe proposed L1‐approach provides a robust method to prevent streaking artifacts generated by dipole‐inconsistent data, renders brain mask calculation unessential, and opens novel challenging clinical applications such asassessing brain hemorrhages and cortical layers.
Brain Mapping, QSM, FANSI, 610, Brain, Bayes Theorem, 530, L1-norm, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, total variation, 03 Salud y bienestar, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, 03 Good Health and Well-being, hemorrhage, Artifacts, Algorithms
Brain Mapping, QSM, FANSI, 610, Brain, Bayes Theorem, 530, L1-norm, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, total variation, 03 Salud y bienestar, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, 03 Good Health and Well-being, hemorrhage, Artifacts, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
