Downloads provided by UsageCounts
arXiv: 1701.07668
PurposeMagnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a relatively new approach that provides quantitative MRI measures using randomized acquisition. Extraction of physical quantitative tissue parameters is performed offline, without the need of patient presence, based on acquisition with varying parameters and a dictionary generated according to the Bloch equation simulations. MRF uses hundreds of radio frequency (RF) excitation pulses for acquisition, and therefore, a high undersampling ratio in the sampling domain (k‐space) is required for reasonable scanning time. This undersampling causes spatial artifacts that hamper the ability to accurately estimate the tissue's quantitative values. In this work, we introduce a new approach for quantitative MRI using MRF, called magnetic resonance fingerprinting with low rank (FLOR).MethodsWe exploit the low‐rank property of the concatenated temporal imaging contrasts, on top of the fact that the MRF signal is sparsely represented in the generated dictionary domain. We present an iterative recovery scheme that consists of a gradient step followed by a low‐rank projection using the singular value decomposition.ResultsExperimental results consist of retrospective sampling that allows comparison to a well defined reference, and prospective sampling that shows the performance of FLOR for a real‐data sampling scenario. Both experiments demonstrate improved parameter accuracy compared to other compressed‐sensing and low‐rank based methods for MRF at 5% and 9% sampling ratios for the retrospective and prospective experiments, respectively.ConclusionsWe have shown through retrospective and prospective experiments that by exploiting the low‐rank nature of the MRF signal, FLOR recovers the MRF temporal undersampled images and provides more accurate parameter maps compared to previous iterative approaches.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), FOS: Physical sciences, Models, Theoretical, Physics - Medical Physics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Artifacts, Algorithms
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Computer Science - Information Theory, Information Theory (cs.IT), FOS: Physical sciences, Models, Theoretical, Physics - Medical Physics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Humans, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Artifacts, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 70 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 26 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts