
doi: 10.1002/mop.28658
ABSTRACTThe alternating direction implicit‐finite‐difference time‐domain (ADI‐FDTD) method can be seen as a second‐order perturbation of the Crank–Nicolson FDTD (CN‐FDTD) scheme. When the PML is introduced for the ADI‐FDTD method, the perturbation term will affect the stability of the ADI‐FDTD method. In this work, the stability analysis of the PML schemes for the ADI‐FDTD and CN‐FDTD are demonstrated. It is found that the PML equations for ADI‐FDTD method will be unstable due to the perturbation term. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 56:2637–2642, 2014
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
