
pmid: 32281738
ScopeMethods to verify cranberry juice consumption are lacking. Predictive multivariate models built upon validated biomarkers may help to verify human consumption of a food using a nutrimetabolomics approach.MethodsA 21‐day double‐blinded, randomized, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study was conducted among healthy young women aged 1829. Plasma was collected at baseline and after 3‐day and 21‐day consumption of cranberry or placebo juice. Plasma metabolome was analyzed using UHPLC coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry.Results18 discriminant metabolites in positive mode and 18 discriminant metabolites in negative mode from a previous 3‐day open‐label study were re‐discovered in the present blinded study. Predictive orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS‐DA) models were able to identify cranberry juice consumers over a placebo juice group with 96.9% correction rates after 3‐day consumption in both positive and negative mode. This present study revealed 84 and 109 additional discriminant metabolites in positive and negative mode, respectively. Twelve of them were tentatively identified.ConclusionCranberry juice consumers were classified with high correction rates using predictive OPLS‐DA models built upon validated plasma biomarkers. Additional biomarkers were tentatively identified. These OPLS‐DA models and biomarkers provided an objective approach to verify participant compliance in future clinical trials.
Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Discriminant Analysis, Models, Biological, Mass Spectrometry, Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Placebos, Young Adult, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Female, Least-Squares Analysis, Biomarkers, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Adult, Cross-Over Studies, Discriminant Analysis, Models, Biological, Mass Spectrometry, Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Placebos, Young Adult, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Female, Least-Squares Analysis, Biomarkers, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
