
pmid: 17039459
AbstractThe free radical scavenging activities of three flavonoids (quercetin, rutin and catechin) and four hydroxycinnamic acids (caffeic, ferulic, sinapic, and chlorogenic acids) were evaluated using both oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity (LPIC) assays. The cytoprotective effects of these compounds were also measured by the degree of protection against H2O2‐induced damage of human Jurkat cells. All compounds exhibited protection against H2O2‐mediated cytotoxicity in a dose‐dependent manner. The concentrations required to result in a 50% reduction in cell death (EC50 value) were calculated from their dose‐response curves. These ranged from 0.15–2.65 μM. Overall, the four hydroxycinnamic acids tested were less effective than the three flavonoids, and of all compounds tested, quercetin offered the strongest protection against H2O2‐induced cell death. A comparison of the results showed that the ability to inhibit peroxidation of lipids in a liposomal system (LPIC) correlated well with the cytoprotective activities (EC50), but not with the ability to protect an aqueous fluorescent substrate in the ORAC assays. The results suggest that the behavior of antioxidants in a liposomal membrane is to some extent similar to the mechanism involved in the protection of living cells from oxidative damage.
Flavonoids, Cell Death, Cell Survival, Rutin, Hydroxycinnamic acids, Free Radical Scavengers, Hydrogen Peroxide, Antioxidants, Catechin, Jurkat Cells, Lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity, Humans, Quercetin, Lipid Peroxidation, Antioxidant, Reactive Oxygen Species
Flavonoids, Cell Death, Cell Survival, Rutin, Hydroxycinnamic acids, Free Radical Scavengers, Hydrogen Peroxide, Antioxidants, Catechin, Jurkat Cells, Lipid peroxidation inhibition capacity, Humans, Quercetin, Lipid Peroxidation, Antioxidant, Reactive Oxygen Species
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 72 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
