
doi: 10.1002/mma.4480
A two‐dimensional sparse‐data tomographic problem is studied. The target is assumed to be a homogeneous object bounded by a smooth curve. A nonuniform rational basis splines (NURBS) curve is used as a computational representation of the boundary. This approach conveniently provides the result in a format readily compatible with computer‐aided design software. However, the linear tomography task becomes a nonlinear inverse problem because of the NURBS‐based parameterization. Therefore, Bayesian inversion with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling is used for calculating an estimate of the NURBS control points. The reconstruction method is tested with both simulated data and measured X‐ray projection data. The proposed method recovers the shape and the attenuation coefficient significantly better than the baseline algorithm (optimally thresholded total variation regularization), but at the cost of heavier computation.
Biomedical imaging and signal processing, Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian inversion, Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, computer-aided design, shape recovery, reverse engineering, Computer-aided design (modeling of curves and surfaces), Computational methods in Markov chains, Numerical analysis or methods applied to Markov chains, nonuniform rational basis splines curve, X-ray tomography, total variation regularization
Biomedical imaging and signal processing, Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo methods, Bayesian inversion, Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling, computer-aided design, shape recovery, reverse engineering, Computer-aided design (modeling of curves and surfaces), Computational methods in Markov chains, Numerical analysis or methods applied to Markov chains, nonuniform rational basis splines curve, X-ray tomography, total variation regularization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
