
doi: 10.1002/mma.4098
This paper is mainly considered whether the mean‐square stability of neutral stochastic delay differential equations (NSDDEs) with jumps is shared with that of the backward Euler–Maruyama method. Under the one‐sided Lipschitz condition and the linear growth condition, the trivial solution of NSDDEs with jumps is proved to be mean‐square stable by using the functional comparison principle and the Barbalat's lemma. It is shown that the backward Euler–Maruyama method can reproduce the mean‐square stability of the trivial solution under the same conditions. The implicit backward Euler–Maruyama method shows better characteristic than the explicit Euler–Maruyama method for the reason that it works without the linear growth condition on the drift coefficient. Compared with some existing results, our results do not need to add extra condition on the neutral part. The conclusions can be applied to NSDDEs and SDDEs with jumps. The effectiveness of the theoretical results is illustrated by an example. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Barbalat's lemma, comparison principle, backward Euler-Maruyama method, mean-square stability, neutral stochastic delay differential equations with jumps, Computational methods for stochastic equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Stochastic ordinary differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis)
Barbalat's lemma, comparison principle, backward Euler-Maruyama method, mean-square stability, neutral stochastic delay differential equations with jumps, Computational methods for stochastic equations (aspects of stochastic analysis), Stochastic ordinary differential equations (aspects of stochastic analysis)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
