ABSTRACT Ionization and fragmentation are at the core of mass spectrometry. But they are not necessarily separated in space, as in‐source fragmentation can also occur. Here, we survey the literature published since our 2005 review on the internal energy and fragmentation in electrospray ionization sources. We present new thermometer molecules to diagnose and quantify source heating, provide tables of recommended threshold ( E 0 ) and appearance energies ( E app ) for the survival yield method, and attempt to compare the softness of a variety of ambient pressure ionization sources. The droplet size distribution and desolvation dynamics play a major role: lower average internal energies are obtained when the ions remain protected by a solvation shell and spend less time nakedly exposed to activating conditions in the transfer interface. Methods based on small droplet formation without charging can thus be softer than electrospray. New dielectric barrier discharge sources can gas‐phase ionize small molecules while conferring barely more internal energy than electrospray ionization. However, the tuning of the entire source interface often has an even greater influence on ion internal energies and fragmentation than on the ionization process itself. We hope that this review will facilitate further research to control and standardize in‐source ion activation conditions, and to ensure the transferability of data and research results in mass spectrometry.