
doi: 10.1002/mas.20068
pmid: 16284939
AbstractProtein identification by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is key to most proteomics projects and has been widely explored in bioinformatics research. Obtaining good and trustful identification results has important implications for biological and clinical work. Although well matured, automated software identification of proteins from MS/MS data still faces a number of obstacles due to the complexity of the proteome or procedural issues of mass spectrometry data acquisition. Expected or unexpected modifications of the peptide sequences, polymorphisms, errors in databases, missed or non‐specific cleavages, unusual fragmentation patterns, and single MS/MS spectra of multiple peptides of the same m/z are so many pitfalls for identification algorithms. A lot of research work has been carried out in recent years that yielded new strategies to handle a number of these issues. Multiple MS/MS identification algorithms are now available or have been theoretically described. The difficulty resides in choosing the most adapted method for each type of spectra being identified. This review presents an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art bioinformatics approaches to the identification of proteins by MS/MS to help the reader doing the spadework of finding the right tools among the many possibilities offered. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Mass Spec Rev 25:235–254, 2006
Automation, Proteins, Peptide Mapping, Mass Spectrometry
Automation, Proteins, Peptide Mapping, Mass Spectrometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 139 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
