Multi‐term π‐institutions and their equivalence
Copyright policy )Multi‐term π‐institutions and their equivalence
AbstractThe notion of a multi‐term π‐institution is introduced and a criterion for the equivalence of two multi‐term π‐institutions in terms of their categories of theories is proved. Moreover, a counterexample that shows that this criterion is false for arbitrary π‐institutions is given. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
- University of Barcelona Spain
Grothendieck construction, cofibrations, representability, Abstract deductive systems, isomorphism theorem, categorical abstract algebraic logic, Theories (e.g., algebraic theories), structure, and semantics, category of theories, interpretability, Categorical logic, topoi
Grothendieck construction, cofibrations, representability, Abstract deductive systems, isomorphism theorem, categorical abstract algebraic logic, Theories (e.g., algebraic theories), structure, and semantics, category of theories, interpretability, Categorical logic, topoi
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).2 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!