
doi: 10.1002/lary.29922
pmid: 34704617
Objectives/HypothesisTo determine the impact of vestibular schwannoma (VS) position relative to the internal auditory canal (IAC) on postoperative facial nerve function and extent of surgical resection.Study DesignRetrospective chart review.MethodsRetrospective review of patients undergoing resection of large (≥25 mm) VSs. Outcome measures included early (≤1 month) facial function, long‐term (≥1 year) facial function and extent of resection. Tumor measurements included the greatest dimension, dimension anterior to the IAC axis, dimension posterior to the IAC axis, and a ratio of posterior‐to‐anterior dimension (PA ratio).ResultsA total of 127 patients met inclusion criteria. In early follow‐up, 60% patients had good (House‐Brackmann I–II), and 40% patients had poor (House‐Brackmann III–VI) facial function. In long‐term follow‐up, 71% patients had good, and 29% patients had poor facial function. A total of 72% of patients underwent gross total resection (GTR) of their tumors. Patients with good facial function had significantly larger PA ratios than patients with poor function both early and long term; however, greatest dimension was the more clearly significant independent predictor of facial outcomes. A larger PA ratio was observed in patients in whom GTR was achieved, but this association was potentially confounded by surgeon preferences and was not statistically significant after controlling for surgical site.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that VS position relative to the IAC axis can be used along with tumor size to predict postoperative facial outcomes. A greater proportion of tumor posterior to the IAC axis was associated with significantly better facial outcomes.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 132:1093–1098, 2022
Facial Nerve, Treatment Outcome, Ear, Inner, Humans, Cerebellopontine Angle, Neuroma, Acoustic, Neurosurgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies
Facial Nerve, Treatment Outcome, Ear, Inner, Humans, Cerebellopontine Angle, Neuroma, Acoustic, Neurosurgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
