
doi: 10.1002/lary.24682
pmid: 24648271
Objectives/HypothesisTo determine the effectiveness of using of an otoscopy stimulator to teach medical students the primary principles of otoscopy in large group training sessions and improve their confidence in making otologic diagnoses.Study DesignCross‐sectional survey design.MethodsIn March 2013, the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery held a large‐scale otoscopy simulator teaching session at the MaRS Innovation Center for 92 first and second year University of Toronto medical students. Following the training session, students were provided with an optional electronic, nine‐question survey related to their experience with learning otoscopy using the simulators alone, and in comparison to traditional methods of teaching.ResultsThirty‐four medical students completed the survey. Ninety‐one percent of the respondents indicated that the overall quality of the event was either very good or excellent. A total of 71% of respondents either agreed, or strongly agreed, that the otoscopy simulator training session improved their confidence in diagnosing pathologies of the ear. The majority (70%) of students indicated that the training session had stimulated their interest in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery as a medical specialty.ConclusionsOrganizing large‐group otoscopy simulator training sessions is one method whereby students can become familiar with a wide variety of pathologies of the ear and improve both their diagnostic accuracy and their confidence in making otologic diagnoses.Level of EvidenceNA Laryngoscope, 124:2594–2597, 2014
Male, Models, Educational, Students, Medical, Otoscopy, Otolaryngology, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Computer Simulation, Female, Educational Measurement, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Male, Models, Educational, Students, Medical, Otoscopy, Otolaryngology, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Computer Simulation, Female, Educational Measurement, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
