Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Laryngoscopearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
The Laryngoscope
Article . 2014
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The behavior of mastoidectomy cavities following modified radical mastoidectomy

Authors: Gundula, Thiel; John A, Rutka; David D, Pothier;

The behavior of mastoidectomy cavities following modified radical mastoidectomy

Abstract

Objectives/HypothesisAn analysis of the frequency and intensity of postoperative aftercare required for modified radical mastoidectomy (MRM) and patterns of healing in the postoperative period.Study DesignA retrospective review of all primary modified radical mastoidectomies carried out for cholesteatoma under the care of the senior author between the years of 2004 and 2009 with minimum follow‐up of 2 years.MethodsThe time and number of interventions required to achieve a stable and dry mastoid cavity were collected. Cross‐sectional and longitudinal analysis of the behavior of the cavities was carried out.ResultsOverall, 73 cases (71 patients) were identified. Patients were followed up for a median of 45.7 months (interquartile range, 31.8–70.5). After initial debridement, most cavities settled rapidly, but this was not always predictable, with a large proportion requiring further clinical intervention after the cavity was stable, sometimes for prolonged periods of time. At the time of analysis, 73% had achieved a stable cavity, 17 (23%) still required attention (nine for wax removal and eight for debridement); two were lost to follow‐up. No revision surgeries were required. At 6 months, 36% of cavities were settled, 42% at 1 year, 53% at 18 months, and 62% at 2 years. After two standard postoperative visits, a total of 632 visits were made by these patients.ConclusionsFollowing MRM, the majority of patients achieve a dry, self‐cleaning mastoid cavity. This might require periods of intense care interspersed with periods of quiescence. These results allow the benefits of this procedure to be put in the context of the entire patient journey.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope 124:2380–2385, 2014

Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear, Middle Aged, Mastoid, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!