
doi: 10.1002/jum.15323
pmid: 32459382
ObjectivesThis study describes the safety assessment of an A‐scan ultrasonic system for ophthalmic use. The system is an investigational medical device for automatic cataract detection and classification.MethodsThe risk management was based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard DIN EN ISO 14971:2009‐10 and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60601‐2‐37. The calibration of the ultrasonic field was conducted according to the standards IEC 62127‐1:2007 and IEC 62359:2010. The uncertainty on measurements was delineated in agreement with the guide JCGM 100:2008.ResultsAfter risk management, all risks were qualitatively classified as acceptable. The mechanical index (0.08 ± 0.05), soft tissue thermal index (0.08 ± 0.08) and spatial‐peak temporal‐average intensity (0.56 ± 0.59 mW/cm2) were under the maximum index values indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration guidance, Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (0.23, 1, and 17 mW/cm2, respectively).ConclusionsThis study presents a practical approach for the safety assessment of A‐scan ultrasonic systems for ophthalmic use. The safety evaluation of a medical device is mandatory before its use in clinical practice. However, the safety monitoring throughout its life cycle should also be considered, since many device components may deteriorate over time and use.
United States Food and Drug Administration, Transducers, Humans, Ultrasonics, Reference Standards, United States, Ultrasonography
United States Food and Drug Administration, Transducers, Humans, Ultrasonics, Reference Standards, United States, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
