Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Ultrasoun...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Safety Assessment of an A‐Scan Ultrasonic System for Ophthalmic Use

Authors: Lorena Petrella; Paulo Fernandes; Mário Santos; Miguel Caixinha; Sandrina Nunes; Carlos Pinto; Miguel Morgado; +3 Authors

Safety Assessment of an A‐Scan Ultrasonic System for Ophthalmic Use

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study describes the safety assessment of an A‐scan ultrasonic system for ophthalmic use. The system is an investigational medical device for automatic cataract detection and classification.MethodsThe risk management was based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard DIN EN ISO 14971:2009‐10 and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60601‐2‐37. The calibration of the ultrasonic field was conducted according to the standards IEC 62127‐1:2007 and IEC 62359:2010. The uncertainty on measurements was delineated in agreement with the guide JCGM 100:2008.ResultsAfter risk management, all risks were qualitatively classified as acceptable. The mechanical index (0.08 ± 0.05), soft tissue thermal index (0.08 ± 0.08) and spatial‐peak temporal‐average intensity (0.56 ± 0.59 mW/cm2) were under the maximum index values indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration guidance, Marketing Clearance of Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems and Transducers (0.23, 1, and 17 mW/cm2, respectively).ConclusionsThis study presents a practical approach for the safety assessment of A‐scan ultrasonic systems for ophthalmic use. The safety evaluation of a medical device is mandatory before its use in clinical practice. However, the safety monitoring throughout its life cycle should also be considered, since many device components may deteriorate over time and use.

Keywords

United States Food and Drug Administration, Transducers, Humans, Ultrasonics, Reference Standards, United States, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!