
doi: 10.1002/jts.22288
pmid: 29786891
AbstractThe United States permits foreign nationals to apply for asylum if they have experienced persecution or have a fear of future persecution. In order to meet the criteria for persecution, the harm inflicted upon the asylum seeker does not need to be or have been physical and can include psychological sequelae. In an effort to document persecution, lawyers seek the assistance of health professionals when preparing their clients’ asylum applications. Mental health professionals work to corroborate psychological evidence of the asylum seeker's report of ill treatment through evaluation and presentation of their findings in the form of legal affidavits. This study gathered the experiences of 15 mental health clinicians who conduct forensic psychological evaluations and document the impact of torture and other human rights violations on asylum seekers. We analyzed the resulting interview transcripts using a consensual qualitative research (CQR) approach. The results of the study highlight challenges associated with this work, suggest recommendations for training, and encourage advocacy endeavors by mental health professionals who provide these services.
Adult, Male, Torture, Patient Advocacy, Forensic Psychology, Interviews as Topic, Physicians, Humans, Cultural Competency, Physician's Role, Qualitative Research, Aged, Psychiatry, Refugees, Emigration and Immigration, Middle Aged, Human Rights Abuses, Female, Clinical Competence
Adult, Male, Torture, Patient Advocacy, Forensic Psychology, Interviews as Topic, Physicians, Humans, Cultural Competency, Physician's Role, Qualitative Research, Aged, Psychiatry, Refugees, Emigration and Immigration, Middle Aged, Human Rights Abuses, Female, Clinical Competence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
