
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8920
pmid: 29388682
AbstractBACKGROUNDRelationships between process and peanut texture have only been studied in Hypogaea species, and focused on very limited processing conditions. In this study, 94 samples were prepared from a combination of 12 raw materials (Arachis hypogaea and fastigiata cultivars) and 11 roasting conditions (maceration in water, aqueous glucose and at different pH values followed by frying or baking). Texture was analyzed by a trained sensory panel (spectrum method) and large deformation compression tests (TA/XT2), and the microstructure probed with confocal microscopy and X‐ray tomography.RESULTSThe impact of maceration on ‘crispy’, ‘crunchy’ and ‘hardness’ sensory attributes was significantly larger when adding glucose in this step, whereas the effect of pH was minor. The relationship held for both fried and baked peanuts as well as for both A. hypogaea and fastigiata subspecies. The degree of alveolation was similar in differently processed peanuts, even though sensory attributes were significantly different.CONCLUSIONSMaceration in different media can yield large textural changes in both peanut species, for both baking and frying. Maceration in glucose solutions can induce much larger textural changes than maceration in water. Quantitative data on alveolation show that microstructure disruption through steam generation cannot explain all the texture differences among processed peanuts. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
Quality Control, Maceration, Arachis, Melanoidins, Tomography, X-Ray, Peanut, Taste, Seeds, Humans, Texture, Cooking, Microstructure, X-ray tomography
Quality Control, Maceration, Arachis, Melanoidins, Tomography, X-Ray, Peanut, Taste, Seeds, Humans, Texture, Cooking, Microstructure, X-ray tomography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
