
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8803
pmid: 29194641
AbstractBACKGROUNDNumerous studies indicate mineral deficiencies in people on a gluten‐free (GF) diet. These deficiencies may indicate that GF products are a less valuable source of minerals than gluten‐containing products. In the study, the nutritional quality of 50 GF products is discussed taking into account the nutritional requirements for minerals expressed as percentage of recommended daily allowance (%RDA) or percentage of adequate intake (%AI) for a model celiac patient. Elements analyzed were calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, copper, iron, manganese, and zinc. Analysis of %RDA or %AI was performed using principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA).RESULTSUsing PCA, the differentiation between products based on rice, corn, potato, GF wheat starch and based on buckwheat, chickpea, millet, oats, amaranth, teff, quinoa, chestnut, and acorn was possible. In the HCA, four clusters were created. The main criterion determining the adherence of the sample to the cluster was the content of all minerals included to HCA (K, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn); however, only the Mn content differentiated four formed groups.CONCLUSIONGF products made of buckwheat, chickpea, millet, oats, amaranth, teff, quinoa, chestnut, and acorn are better source of minerals than based on other GF raw materials, what was confirmed by PCA and HCA. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
Minerals, Avena, Glutens, Recommended Dietary Allowances, Zea mays, Diet, Gluten-Free, Humans, Chenopodium quinoa, Edible Grain, Millets, Nutritive Value, Fagopyrum
Minerals, Avena, Glutens, Recommended Dietary Allowances, Zea mays, Diet, Gluten-Free, Humans, Chenopodium quinoa, Edible Grain, Millets, Nutritive Value, Fagopyrum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
