
pmid: 470349
AbstractTwelve gilts from four breeds were reared from 30 to 65 kg liveweight and assessed for carcass, muscle and eating quality. The breeds were Large White (LW), Gloucester Old Spot (GOS) Crossbreed 1 (C1) and Crossbreed 2 (C2). The latter two were commercial products from breeding companies. There were small differences in quality between the breeds. C1 had about 2% more lean than the others. GOS had shorter carcasses, a higher proportion of total lean in the fore limb and thicker backfat but were not fatter overall. C1 and C2 had lower pH1 measurements than LW or GOS but similar colour and drip loss measurements in M. longissimus lumborum. There were positive but weak relationships between pH1 and percentage fat (r= +0.1 to +0.3). C1 had the more tender meat. When all breeds were pooled, about 9 % of the variation in toughness was accounted for by variation in percentage lean or fat. There was no suggestion that the pure breeds or fatter pigs had meat of better eating quality.
Meat, Swine, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Food Analysis, United Kingdom
Meat, Swine, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Food Analysis, United Kingdom
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
