
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11437
pmid: 34312871
AbstractBACKGROUNDThe use of plant proteins as food ingredients might be limited due to the presence of foreign or ‘off’ flavors, which may evolve during extraction and subsequent processing. In this study, the influence of dry (TVP) and wet (WTP) texturization on characteristic volatile compounds of two different pea protein isolates was assessed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry‐olfactometry (GC–MS‐O) after direct immersion stir bar sorptive extraction (DI‐SBSE).RESULTSTwenty‐four odor‐active compounds were found, with a prevalence of carbonyls from fat oxidation. Nine of these compounds which are also known as major (off‐) flavor contributors in peas were distinctively impacted in all texturates: hexanal, nonanal, 2‐undecanone, (E)‐2‐octenal, (E, Z)‐3,5‐octadiene‐2‐one, (E, E)‐2,4‐decadienal, 2‐pentyl‐furan, 2‐pentyl‐pyridine, and γ‐nonalactone. For example, hexanal, a characteristic green odorant, was reduced by up to sixfold by wet texturization, from 3.29 ± 1.05% (Pea Protein I) to 0.52 ± 0.02% (Pea WTP I). Furthermore, (E,Z)‐3,5‐Octadiene‐2‐one and (E,E)‐2,4‐decadienal were decreased by 1.5‐ and 1.8‐fold when Pea Protein I and Pea TVP I were compared.CONCLUSIONAn overall reduction in fat oxidation products and of green and fatty odor‐active compounds was observed. The results represent a first insight into the process‐related modulation of pea protein (off‐) flavors to broaden the applicability of pea proteins as food ingredients.
Fats, Flavoring Agents, Volatile Organic Compounds, Odorants, Solid Phase Extraction, Oxidation-Reduction, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pisum sativum, Pea Proteins
Fats, Flavoring Agents, Volatile Organic Compounds, Odorants, Solid Phase Extraction, Oxidation-Reduction, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Pisum sativum, Pea Proteins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
