
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10793
pmid: 32892369
AbstractBACKGROUNDOilfish (Ruvettus pretiosus) and escolar (Lepidocybium flavobrunneum) are often used to adulterate high‐value aquatic products, causing serious economic losses to consumers, and even keriorrhea in severe cases. It was difficult to identify them by morphological features for these two fish were processed into steak or fillet. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to develop an accurate and efficient method for detecting the oilfish‑ and escolar‐derived components.RESULTSBy comparing the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences of oilfish, escolar, and 16 varieties susceptible to adulteration, specific primers/probes were designed, and a duplex real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was established to detect oilfish‑ and escolar‐derived components. The specificity and sensitivity of the method were analyzed, and the method was used to analyze 70 commercial samples to evalutate its applicability to actual samples in the market. The method developed was highly specific, without any cross‐reaction on the other 16 species, with a limit of detection (LOD) for DNA of 0.0002 ng μL−1 for R. pretiosus and 0.002 ng μL−1 for L. flavobrunneum. In addition, the LOD for mixed muscle tissues was 0.1 g kg−1. Oilfish‑ and escolar‐derived components were detected in 12 of the 70 commercial samples, a result that is consistent with the classic DNA barcoding test results.CONCLUSIONThe duplex real‐time PCR method developed can be used to detect oilfish and escolar specifically, sensitively and accurately; it provides a good technical support for the identification of authentic aquatic products. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
Fish Proteins, Limit of Detection, Fish Products, Animals, Discriminant Analysis, Food Contamination, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers, Perciformes
Fish Proteins, Limit of Detection, Fish Products, Animals, Discriminant Analysis, Food Contamination, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers, Perciformes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
