
doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10624
pmid: 32614076
AbstractBACKGROUNDThe harvest weights of sweet almonds (Prunus dulcis) have significantly increased to meet consumer demand and now exceed processing facility capabilities. Crops are stockpiled for longer periods, increasing the probability of moisture exposure. Wet almonds can be mechanically dried prior to processing; however, it is unclear how this practice influences lipid oxidation, shelf‐life, and consumer acceptance. To address this, almonds were exposed to 8% moisture and dried with low heat (ME). Almonds were roasted and stored under accelerated conditions for 12 months and markers of lipid oxidation, headspace volatiles, sensory attributes, and consumer liking were evaluated.RESULTSAt 7 months of storage, light roast ME almonds had higher levels of volatiles related to lipid oxidation than non‐moisture exposed almonds (NME) and were significantly higher in oxidized, cardboard and painty / solvent flavors. Although untrained consumers did not show significant preferences between the light roast ME and NME almonds, there were quality losses related to lipid oxidation that trained panelists could detect. Dark roast ME almonds demonstrated significant lipid oxidation by 5 months of storage, indicating they will have a compromised shelf life. Findings also indicate that octanal, nonanal, 2‐octenal, and hexanoic acid are good indicators of consumer acceptability.CONCLUSIONThe results of this research illustrate that post‐harvest moisture exposure with mechanical drying has a significant effect on the storage quality of roasted almonds and is most pronounced in dark roast products. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry
Volatile Organic Compounds, Hot Temperature, Water, Consumer Behavior, Lipids, Prunus dulcis, Food Storage, Taste, Humans, Nuts, Cooking, Oxidation-Reduction
Volatile Organic Compounds, Hot Temperature, Water, Consumer Behavior, Lipids, Prunus dulcis, Food Storage, Taste, Humans, Nuts, Cooking, Oxidation-Reduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
