Reflections on shared cognition

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 01 Mar 2001 United States English Publisher:WileyJournal:Journal of Organizational Behavior, volume 22, pages 195-202 (issn: 0894-3796, eissn: 1099-1379,

Copyright policy )

Authors: Cannon-Bowers, Jams A.; Salas, Eduardo;

doi: 10.1002/job.82

Reflections on shared cognition

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to highlight several fundamental questions that remain regarding shared cognition: (1) What must be ‘shared’? (2) What does ‘shared’ mean? (3) How should ‘shared’ be measured? and (4) What outcomes do we expect shared cognition to affect? A general and integrative description of these questions is provided. In addition, the value of shared cognition is discussed along with recommendations for future research. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Country

United States

Related Organizations

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division
United States
University of Central Florida
United States
Naval Air Systems Command
United States

Keywords

Applied, Psychology, Business, TEAM, Management

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	548
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 1%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 1%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%