
pmid: 22535682
AbstractPurpose:To present and evaluate the feasibility of a novel automatic method for generating 4D blood flow visualizations fusing high spatial resolution 3D and time‐resolved (4D) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) datasets.Materials and Methods:In a first step, the cerebrovascular system is segmented in the 3D MRA dataset and a surface model is computed. The hemodynamic information is extracted from the 4D MRA dataset and transferred to the surface model using rigid registration where it can be visualized color‐coded or dynamically over time. The presented method was evaluated using software phantoms and 20 clinical datasets from patients with an arteriovenous malformation. Clinical evaluation was performed by comparison of Spetzler–Martin scores determined from the 4D blood flow visualizations and corresponding digital subtraction angiographies.Results:The performed software phantom validation showed that the presented method is capable of producing reliable visualization results for vessels with a minimum diameter of 2 mm for which a mean temporal error of 0.27 seconds was achieved. The clinical evaluation based on 20 datasets comparing the 4D visualization to DSA images revealed an excellent interrater reliability.Conclusion:The presented method enables an improved combined representation of blood flow and anatomy while reducing the time needed for clinical rating. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:443–453. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adult, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Blood Flow Velocity, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Adult, Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Blood Flow Velocity, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
