
ObjectiveMindfulness‐based interventions have enjoyed a marked increase in support within biomedical and psychological research and practice in the past two decades. Despite the widespread application of these treatments for a range of psychological and medical conditions, there remains a lack of consensus regarding mechanisms through which these interventions effect change. One plausible yet underexplored mechanism is the therapeutic alliance between participants and mindfulness instructors.MethodsIn this report, data are presented on therapeutic alliance from the mindfulness arm (n = 37) of a randomized controlled trial of a mindfulness‐based smoking cessation treatment.ResultsResults suggest that client‐reported therapeutic alliance measured midtreatment did not significantly predict primary smoking outcomes. Alliance did predict improvement in posttreatment scores on several outcome variables linked to mindfulness practice, including emotion regulation (β = −.24, p = .042), mindfulness (β = .33, p = .007), negative affect (β = −.33, p = .040), as well as treatment compliance (β = .39, p = .011).ConclusionImplications of these relationships and the possible role of therapeutic alliance in mindfulness treatments are explored.
Adult, Male, mechanisms, mindfulness, therapeutic alliance, Smoking, Professional-Patient Relations, Middle Aged, smoking cessation, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychotherapy, Group, Humans, Female, Smoking Cessation, addiction, Group, Mindfulness, group treatment
Adult, Male, mechanisms, mindfulness, therapeutic alliance, Smoking, Professional-Patient Relations, Middle Aged, smoking cessation, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychotherapy, Group, Humans, Female, Smoking Cessation, addiction, Group, Mindfulness, group treatment
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
