Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Radboud Repositoryarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Radboud Repository
Article . 2007
Data sources: Radboud Repository
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Biological responses to multilayered DNA‐coatings

Authors: Beucken, J.J.J.P van den; Walboomers, X.F.; Vos, M.R-J.; Sommerdijk, N.A.J.M.; Nolte, R.J.M.; Jansen, J.A.;

Biological responses to multilayered DNA‐coatings

Abstract

AbstractThis study was performed to evaluate the basic biological response to deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)‐based coatings for soft tissue implants. To that end, in vitro experiments were used to study their cytocompatibility, and in vivo subcutaneous implantation studies with transponders in a rat model were performed to evaluate their histocompatibility. The DNA‐based coatings were fabricated using the electrostatic self‐assembly technique using cationic poly‐D‐lysine or poly‐allylamine hydrochloride and anionic DNA. Noncoated substrates served as controls. In vitro, the behavior of primary rat dermal fibroblasts was assessed in terms of cell proliferation and morphology. Both types of multilayered DNA‐coatings significantly increased rat dermal fibroblast proliferation without altering the morphological appearance of the cells. The tissue response to multilayered DNA‐coatings was assessed using an in vivo rat model, in which transponders were inserted subcutaneously for 4 and 12 weeks. No macroscopic signs of inflammation or adverse tissue reactions were observed at implant retrieval. Histological analyses demonstrated a uniform tissue response to all types of implants. All implants were encapsulated in a fibrous tissue capsule without intervening inflammatory cells at the implant surface. Histomorphometrically, multilayered DNA‐coatings induced fibrous tissue capsules with similar quality and thickness compared to noncoated controls. In addition, all fibrous tissue capsules showed similar expression of α‐smooth muscle actin. This study demonstrates that multilayered DNA‐coatings are cytocompatible and histocompatible, and justifies further research on their functionalization with biologically active compounds to modulate tissue responses. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2006

Country
Netherlands
Keywords

Male, NCMLS 1: Immunity, infection and tissue repair, NCMLS 3: Tissue engineering and pathology, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Implants, Experimental, Materials Testing, UMCN 4.3: Tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery, Polyamines, Animals, Polylysine, Rats, Wistar, Cell Proliferation, Skin, DNA, Prostheses and Implants, Fibroblasts, Immunohistochemistry, Actins, Rats, Histocompatibility, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, NCMLS 7: Chemical and physical biology, Glass, Physical Organic Chemistry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Average
Average
Green