
handle: 10230/660 , 10419/20333
AbstractThis paper applies the theoretical literature on nonparametric bounds on treatment effects to the estimation of how limited English proficiency (LEP) affects wages and employment opportunities for Hispanic workers in the United States. I analyse the identifying power of several weak assumptions on treatment response and selection, and stress the interactions between LEP and education, occupation and immigration status. I show that the combination of two weak but credible assumptions provides informative upper bounds on the returns to language skills for certain subgroups of the population. Adding age at arrival as a monotone instrumental variable also provides informative lower bounds. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Nichtparametrisches Verfahren, hispanic workers, labor market outcomes, language skills, ddc:330, Lohn, Hispanics, J24, Bildungsertrag, Arbeitsmarkt, Hispanic workers, Nonparametric bounds, language skills, Hispanic workers, labor market outcomes, Labour, Public, Development and Health Economics, Vereinigte Staaten, Humankapital, C14, nonparametric bounds, J31, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:C14, jel: jel:J24
Nichtparametrisches Verfahren, hispanic workers, labor market outcomes, language skills, ddc:330, Lohn, Hispanics, J24, Bildungsertrag, Arbeitsmarkt, Hispanic workers, Nonparametric bounds, language skills, Hispanic workers, labor market outcomes, Labour, Public, Development and Health Economics, Vereinigte Staaten, Humankapital, C14, nonparametric bounds, J31, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:C14, jel: jel:J24
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
