
doi: 10.1002/jad.12392
pmid: 39183384
AbstractIntroductionExecutive functions (EF), encompassing inhibition, updating, and shifting, are widely acknowledged as cognitive factors that promote resilience. However, prior research examining the association between EF and resilience has been hampered by inconsistent conceptualizations of resilience and an overreliance on cross‐sectional designs. We embraced a process‐oriented conceptualization of resilience and employed a longitudinal approach to investigate how EF components interplay with the dynamic processes of resilience resources and resilient functioning.MethodsA total of 144 Chinese preadolescents (aged 10–12, 53.5% male) completed computer‐based EF assessments at baseline and self‐reported their resilience at three intervals during 2019–2020. The resilience evaluations encompassed resilience resources at individual, familial, and social levels, as measured by the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents, and resilient functioning, operationalized as the residuals of socioemotional difficulties after accounting for stressful life events.ResultsThe findings emphasized the dynamic nature of resilience, unveiling a developmental cascade from resilience resources to resilient functioning and back to resilience resources. Furthermore, distinct effects of EF components on resilience development were found. Specifically, inhibition was associated with both concurrent and long‐term resilience resources and functioning, while updating predicted long‐term resilience resources, and shifting predicted long‐term resilient functioning.ConclusionThese results underscored the pivotal role of EF as a cognitive foundation in comprehending the dynamic resilience processes during preadolescence.
Male, China, Resilience, Psychological, Executive Function, Inhibition, Psychological, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Child
Male, China, Resilience, Psychological, Executive Function, Inhibition, Psychological, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
