Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Irrigation and Drain...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Irrigation and Drainage
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Dams and development – an insight to the report of the World Commission on Dams1

Authors: Jeremy Bird; Pamela Wallace;

Dams and development – an insight to the report of the World Commission on Dams1

Abstract

AbstractThe World Commission on Dams was initiated as a new form of global policy making to find a way beyond the intensifying conflicts over dam projects. It was established by diverse groups to conduct an independent global review of the performance and impacts of large dams and develop internationally acceptable criteria and guidelines for the future.The Commission's Report, Dams and Development: a New Framework for Decision Making, presents an integrated assessment of how large dams have performed against their development targets and what the costs and impacts have been. Performance was highly variable, with a considerable portion of those studied falling short of physical targets, while many continue to generate benefits beyond their projected economic life. Many were less profitable in economic terms than expected, indicating that there is considerable scope for improving performance of existing projects. The Commission considered the adverse impacts on ecosystems and people's livelihoods to be unacceptable and unnecessary.To move forward beyond conflict, the Commission presents a new framework for decision‐making. It rejects the notion of trading one person's gain against another's loss and proposes an approach based on recognising rights and assessing risks for identifying legitimate stakeholders and negotiating development outcomes. Seven strategic priorities and corresponding policy principles for water and energy resources development were derived from this approach and a series of practical criteria and guidelines are presented.The Commission's recommendations require more attention to be paid to the preliminary stages of planning. This has time and cost implications, but in the long run, the Commission's Report offers the opportunity to reduce conflict, reduce delays and lower overall costs to the operator, the government and to society in general. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!