
doi: 10.1002/ima.22984
handle: 11583/2983368
AbstractMultiple myeloma disrupts normal blood cell production, requiring early detection due to the increased risk of bone metastases. Although various artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been developed to assist pathologists, they often lack comprehensive metrics to measure both detection and segmentation errors. This study presents a hybrid framework that combines deep learning and heuristic techniques to achieve accurate instance segmentation of individual plasma cells in Giemsa‐stained cytology images. Our proposed network, called cyto‐Knet, incorporates an innovative color‐balancing method as a preprocessing step to standardize the appearance of cytological images. Our network leverages a 4‐class segmentation strategy with conditional kernels to enhance segmentation performance and accuracy. Additionally, a marker‐based watershed algorithm is employed in the postprocessing step to address the challenge of merged objects. Extensive validation at both pixel and object‐based levels demonstrates superior performance compared with state‐of‐the‐art techniques. Our method achieves pixel‐based metrics (precision, recall, and F1‐score) of approximately 0.90. The object‐based evaluation reveals an average Dice coefficient of 0.9130 and an aggregated Jaccard index of 0.8237. Importantly, our solution is designed for integration into an end‐to‐end system for diagnosis support and can be easily extended to other applications.
cytology; deep learning; Giemsa stain; instance segmentation; myeloma plasma cells
cytology; deep learning; Giemsa stain; instance segmentation; myeloma plasma cells
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
