
doi: 10.1002/hpm.3105
pmid: 33377202
AbstractBackground and ObjectiveTraffic light labelling (TLL) policy has been adopted to improve consumers' food choices. This qualitative study examined the consumers' perception of TLL and nutritional facts table (NFT) in Iran.DesignWe applied a qualitative method to explore public views and perceptions of NFT and TLL in Iran. Participants ageing 20–75 years old were selected by maximum diversity sampling and interviewed using a semi‐structured in‐depth interview. The interviews were continued until data saturation was achieved after interviewing 35 participants with five more interviews to ensure no new emerging perception. Data was analysed by directed content analysis in MAXQDA 10 software.FindingsFindings indicated that a large number of the participants were not aware of NFT and TLL. There are some reasons for not paying attention to NFT and TLL, which include lack of enough knowledge about NFT and TLL concepts and defects in appearance and details written in these labels, lack of appropriate education about labels, place of putting the labels and lack of enough time for using the labels during shopping.ConclusionsIt is concluded that educational interventions should be applied to ensure their effectiveness in improving healthy food choices.
Adult, Consumer Behavior, Middle Aged, Choice Behavior, Food Preferences, Young Adult, Food Labeling, Humans, Perception, Nutritive Value, Aged
Adult, Consumer Behavior, Middle Aged, Choice Behavior, Food Preferences, Young Adult, Food Labeling, Humans, Perception, Nutritive Value, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
