
AbstractIn recent work, the concentration index has been widely used as a measure of income‐related health inequality. The purpose of this note is to illustrate two different methods for decomposing the overall health concentration index using data collected from a Short Form (SF‐36) survey of the general Australian population conducted in 1995. For simplicity, we focus on the physical functioning scale of the SF‐36. Firstly we examine decomposition ‘by component’ by separating the concentration index for the physical functioning scale into the ten items on which it is based. The results show that the items contribute differently to the overall inequality measure, i.e. two of the items contributed 13% and 5%, respectively, to the overall measure. Second, to illustrate the ‘by subgroup’ method we decompose the concentration index by employment status. This involves separating the population into two groups: individuals currently in employment; and individuals not currently employed. We find that the inequality between these groups is about five times greater than the inequality within each group. These methods provide insights into the nature of inequality that can be used to inform policy design to reduce income related health inequalities. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Employment, Male, Adolescent, Economics, Care, Health Services Accessibility, Social Justice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Status Indicators, Humans, 360, Decomposition, Australia; Concentration index; Decomposition; Health inequality; Short form 36; Unemployment, Australia, Concentration Index, Health Inequality, Health Care Sciences & Services, Short Form 36, Socioeconomic Factors, Unemployment, Health Policy & Services, Female
Adult, Employment, Male, Adolescent, Economics, Care, Health Services Accessibility, Social Justice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Status Indicators, Humans, 360, Decomposition, Australia; Concentration index; Decomposition; Health inequality; Short form 36; Unemployment, Australia, Concentration Index, Health Inequality, Health Care Sciences & Services, Short Form 36, Socioeconomic Factors, Unemployment, Health Policy & Services, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
