
doi: 10.1002/gepi.20261
pmid: 17685457
AbstractMapping complex traits or phenotypes with small genetic effects, whose phenotypes may be modulated by temporal trends in families are challenging. Detailed and accurate data must be available on families, whether or not the data were collected over time. Missing data complicate matters in pedigree analysis, especially in the case of a longitudinal pedigree analysis. Because most analytical methods developed for the analysis of longitudinal pedigree data require no missing data, the researcher is left with the option of dropping those cases (individuals) with missing data from the analysis or imputing values for the missing data. We present the use of data augmentation within Bayesian polygenic and longitudinal polygenic models to produce k complete datasets. The data augmentation, or imputation step of the Markov chain Monte Carlo, takes into account the observed familial information and the observed subject information available at other time points. These k complete datasets can then be used to fit single time point or longitudinal pedigree models. By producing a set of k complete datasets and thus k sets of parameter estimates, the total variance associated with an estimate can be partitioned into a within‐imputation and a between‐imputation component. The method is illustrated using the Genetic Analysis Workshop simulated data. Genet. Epidemiol. 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Multifactorial Inheritance, Models, Statistical, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Genetic Linkage, Statistics as Topic, Bayes Theorem, Pedigree, Phenotype, Humans, Computer Simulation, Longitudinal Studies, Monte Carlo Method
Multifactorial Inheritance, Models, Statistical, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Genetic Linkage, Statistics as Topic, Bayes Theorem, Pedigree, Phenotype, Humans, Computer Simulation, Longitudinal Studies, Monte Carlo Method
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
