
AbstractThe purpose of present research was to investigate the effect of different storage periods on nutrients composition of the two the fish species. In the present study, proximate composition, energy values and oil indexes of two the fish species Scomber australasicus and Scomberomorus guttatus were determined. The lipid content of the fresh S. guttatus was found significantly higher than the S. australasicus (p < .05). The S. australasicus after 2 months storage found lowest calorie value (275.5 kcal/kg). The calorie values of S. australasicus after 4 months storage was 292.5 kcal/kg and for S. guttatus after 6 months storage (375.70 kcal/kg) found highest. The number of acidic and peroxide for both types of fish after 2 months storage found 2.66 mg KOH/g and 4.22 meqO2/kg for S. australasicus, and found 2.47 mg KOH/g and 3.76 meqO2/kg for S. guttatus which were lowest compared to the other two treatments. The storage periods after the canning process led to a decrease in protein and moisture contents and increase in the lipid content of the canned tuna. The calorie level was related to the parameters such as fat level of the processed S. guttatus after 6 months storage which lead to high calorie level (375.70 kcal/kg−1), while processed S. australasicus after 2 months storage with lower fat content (15.1%) had lower energy value (275.5 kcal/kg−1). The highest acidic, and peroxide value for treatment 6 months storage for canned fish S. guttatus was 4.34 ± 0.36 mg KOH/g, and 5.74 ± 0.25 (meqO2/kg), while for S. australasicus was 4.21 ± 0.34 mg KOH/g, and 6.67 ± 0.23 (meqO2/kg), It can be concluded for fish 6 months storaged S. guttatus, shelf life increased the and can be stored for several years.
Original Articles
Original Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
