
handle: 10044/1/104797
Agricultural expansion is a primary driver of biodiversity decline in forested regions of the tropics. Consequently, it is important to understand the conservation value of remnant forests in production landscapes. In a tropical landscape dominated by oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), we characterized faunal communities across eight taxa occurring within riparian forest buffers, which are legally protected alongside rivers, and compared them to nearby recovering logged forest. Buffer width was the main predictor of species richness and abundance, with widths of 40–100 m on each side of the river supporting broadly equivalent levels of biodiversity as compared to logged forest. However, width responses varied markedly among taxa, and buffers often lacked forest‐dependent species. Much wider buffers than are currently mandated are needed to safeguard most species. The largest biodiversity gains are achieved by increasing relatively narrow buffers. To provide optimal conservation outcomes in tropical production landscapes, we encourage policy makers to prescribe width requirements for key taxa and different landscape contexts.
IMPACTS, 570, CONSERVATION, 4102 Ecological Applications, 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, 41 Environmental Sciences, QUALITY, 4101 Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, 580, Science & Technology, Ecology, 15 Life on Land, LOGGED TROPICAL FORESTS, SPECIES-DIVERSITY, 3007 Forestry Sciences, SABAH, ZONES, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences, RESPONSES, 31 Biological Sciences
IMPACTS, 570, CONSERVATION, 4102 Ecological Applications, 30 Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, 41 Environmental Sciences, QUALITY, 4101 Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, 580, Science & Technology, Ecology, 15 Life on Land, LOGGED TROPICAL FORESTS, SPECIES-DIVERSITY, 3007 Forestry Sciences, SABAH, ZONES, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Environmental Sciences, RESPONSES, 31 Biological Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
