Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Transaction...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Transactions on Telecommunications
Article . 2011 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2020
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Reciprocity for MIMO systems

Authors: Christopher S. Withers; Saralees Nadarajah;

Reciprocity for MIMO systems

Abstract

We give reciprocity results for the channel capacity efficiency (i.e. the capacity/bandwidth – abbreviated here to capacity) of an N-transmit M-receive antenna wireless system, when the gain matrix is known to the receiver but not the transmitter. The channel may be non-Gaussian. Transmitter power or receiver noise may be variable. We consider the case when N or M is large but not both. Formulas are also given for the mean capacity when there is correlation at both ends. Capacity is approximately Gaussian. For a non-Gaussian channel the approximate mean capacity is not changed but the variance is increased by a certain factor. It is noted that reciprocity fails. The key to making it work is to introduce a ‘power factor’ that allows for the case when the power of each transmitter does not depend on N as well as for the usual case when the total power is fixed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!