
doi: 10.1002/erv.2227
pmid: 23440765
AbstractBackgroundDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for eating disorders (EDs) are problematic and due to be revised. One area of debate concerns binge eating.AimsWe investigated the impact of four aspects of binge eating (binge size, loss of control, frequency of objective and subjective binge eating) assessed by questionnaire and interview in adult ED patients on concurrent and follow‐up symptoms.MethodData came from two independent naturalistic Swedish ED databases (N = 2354, with 12‐month follow‐up; and N = 597, with 36‐month follow‐up).ResultsWe found fair concurrent validity of criteria assessed using questionnaire, but poor concurrent validity for interview assessment, and no prognostic validity regardless of assessment method.ConclusionsThe findings give support to some planned DSM‐5 revisions, but challenge the assumption of binge eating as a useful diagnostic criterion, as well as having implications for measurement. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Bulimia, Binge-Eating Disorder
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Bulimia, Binge-Eating Disorder
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
