
doi: 10.1002/erv.1124
pmid: 21789779
AbstractBackgroundPrevious studies found inconsistent differences in disgust sensitivity between patients with a variety of eating disorders and normal controls.AimThe objective of this study was to compare disgust sensitivity between a larger and more specific sample of anorexia nervosa (AN) patients and control subjects.MethodWe compared the scores on the ‘disgust sensitivity scale’ of AN patients (N = 62) and control subjects (N = 62) using a multivariate analysis of variance. All subjects were women.ResultsAN patients scored consistently higher on all domains of disgust sensitivity. This difference was significant for six of eight disgust domains. The largest significant difference between the groups was on the domains food and magical thinking.ConclusionOur findings elaborate on previous findings and are in line with recent neurological findings suggesting that disgust and insular impairments are associated with AN. Clinical implications of our findings are discussed. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Surveys and Questionnaires, Emotions, Humans, Female, Magic
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Surveys and Questionnaires, Emotions, Humans, Female, Magic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
