
doi: 10.1002/ep.12674
Hydrodynamic cavitation for the degradation of organic solvents was investigated in detail using a newer form of cavitating device‐vortex diode. The results were also compared with that using conventional cavitating device orifice. Removal of three different organic solvents—acetone, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), and toluene were studied on a pilot plant with capacity of 1 m3/h. The effect of different operating parameters such as inlet pressure, initial concentration, and reactor type on the degradation rate of solvent was investigated in detail. The results revealed that efficiency of solvent removal varies substantially with the change in physical operating conditions and nature of the solvent. It was found that up to 80% degradation could be achieved for toluene (cavitational yield 32.2 × 10−3 mg/J), substantially higher than that for acetone and MEK indicating the effect of molecular weight/structure in the degradation process. Further, the results clearly indicated chemical oxidation as a predominant mechanism for degradation and not physical destruction. Vortex diode that works on the principle of vortex generation for cavitation, was found to be far superior over conventional cavitating device‐orifice‐ ∼up to eight times higher cavitational yield could be obtained for toluene as compared to orifice. The results of this study provide newer insight into solvent removal using hydrodynamic cavitation and would have bearing on the treatment of solvent containing wastewaters. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 295–304, 2018
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2105, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2305, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304, vortex diode, name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, effluent treatment, name=Environmental Engineering, name=Renewable Energy, pollution, name=Waste Management and Disposal, name=General Environmental Science, wastewater, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300, industry, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy, Sustainability and the Environment, name=General Chemical Engineering, 540, 620, name=Environmental Chemistry, name=Water Science and Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1500/1500, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2312, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2311
/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2100/2105, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2305, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2304, vortex diode, name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy, effluent treatment, name=Environmental Engineering, name=Renewable Energy, pollution, name=Waste Management and Disposal, name=General Environmental Science, wastewater, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2300, industry, /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy, Sustainability and the Environment, name=General Chemical Engineering, 540, 620, name=Environmental Chemistry, name=Water Science and Technology, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1500/1500, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2312, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2311
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 46 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
