
arXiv: 2604.15067
ABSTRACT Internal climate variability arises from the climate system's inherently chaotic dynamics. Quantifying it is essential for climate science, as it enables risk‐based decision‐making and differentiates between externally forced change and internal fluctuations. In statistical terms, natural variability corresponds to aleatoric uncertainty, that is, irreducible stochastic variability. Despite this close conceptual alignment, the link between internal climate variability and aleatoric uncertainty has not yet been formalized. We establish a theoretical link by showing that member‐to‐member differences in single‐model large ensembles provide a direct representation of aleatoric uncertainty. To quantify the spatio‐temporal structure of aleatoric uncertainty, we employ generalized additive models. The proposed framework is validated through comparison with ERA5‐Land reanalysis data, demonstrating that ensemble‐derived estimates reproduce key spatial and temporal patterns of real‐world variability. Applied to the water balance over the Iberian Peninsula, our approach reveals coherent variability structures and pronounced regional heterogeneity. We find a decline in variability in drought‐prone regions and seasons, a pattern that strengthens under +3°C global warming, implying an increased risk of persistent summer drought conditions. Beyond this application, the framework is climate‐model agnostic and transferable to other variables and spatial scales, providing a statistical basis for quantifying internal climate variability as aleatoric uncertainty.
Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Applications, Methodology, Applications (stat.AP)
Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Applications, Methodology, Applications (stat.AP)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
